http://talktorex.co.uk/node/739 Comments for "I don't know..." en-gb http://talktorex.co.uk/node/739 <p>...what I find more distressing: that the BBC could produce such a pile of bilge as Saturday's <em>Doctor Who</em> ("The Unicorn and the Wasp", or "the one where Agatha Christie is inadequately parodied whilst a giant CGI wasp is inadequately explained"), or that <a href="http://blogs.thestage.co.uk/tvtoday/2008/05/doctor-who-47-the-unicorn-and-the-wasp/index.html" rel="nofollow">The Stage's reviewer</a> could, without a trace of irony, describe it as "the best edition of the show since its 1963 beginnings".</p> <p>Certainly the most creaky, ill-conceived, poorly-executed and illogical edition of the show since its 1963 beginnings.</p> <p>Actually, that's not fair. There was the one with the Doctor's daughter... er... last week.</p> <p>And has anybody else noticed that they're lighting the show like it's the 1980s all over again? Even in 1920s costume drama the LX man found a use for his pink gel...</p> http://talktorex.co.uk/node/739#comment Mon, 19 May 2008 10:34:19 +0000 James Lark 739 at http://talktorex.co.uk