<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://talktorex.co.uk" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Talk To Rex - Just brilliant - Comments</title>
 <link>http://talktorex.co.uk/node/741</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Just brilliant&quot;</description>
 <language>en-gb</language>
<item>
 <title>Just brilliant</title>
 <link>http://talktorex.co.uk/node/741</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How do they do it? After a whole series of derivative (and badly-lit) crapness, how does &lt;em&gt;Doctor Who&lt;/em&gt; come up with a two-parter which comes so close to perfection that I&#039;m just not going to quibble over the few bits that didn&#039;t quite work?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two words: Steven Moffat.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, script writers don&#039;t have any control over how a production turns out, the quality of the acting, or how well-lit an episode is. But &quot;Silence in the Library&quot; and &quot;Forest of the Dead&quot; showed - again - that if you get the script right first, the rest often follows. Twas ever thus, as the chequered history of &lt;em&gt;Doctor Who&lt;/em&gt; amply demonstrates. It&#039;s something that the current production team seem to have been largely ignoring lately, but which Moffat clearly understands - which bodes well for his forthcoming stint as executive producer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bring it on!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://talktorex.co.uk/node/741#comment</comments>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 18:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Lark</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">741 at http://talktorex.co.uk</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
