<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://talktorex.co.uk" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Talk To Rex - The threatening man in the sky - Comments</title>
 <link>http://talktorex.co.uk/node/791</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;The threatening man in the sky&quot;</description>
 <language>en-gb</language>
<item>
 <title>The threatening man in the sky</title>
 <link>http://talktorex.co.uk/node/791</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For what possible reason does &lt;a href=&#039;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7740596.stm&#039;&gt;the BBC&#039;s latest update on the Somali pirates-and-Saudi tanker situation&lt;/a&gt; have the title &lt;em&gt;&#039;Experts&#039; lead Saudi tanker talks&lt;/em&gt;? Why not &lt;em&gt;Experts lead Saudi tanker talks&lt;/em&gt;? Is there anything in the article that suggests they aren&#039;t experts, that they are (in one of the more hideous and over-used expressions in modern parlance) &#039;so-called experts&#039;? Not that I can see, although I do note that there&#039;s almost no actual &lt;em&gt;news&lt;/em&gt; in the story, just rumour being peddled by &#039;correspondents&#039; (that means other journalists), and a lot of weasely sentences that are true no matter what the reality of the situation is.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course there&#039;s no way of knowing, but this feels like authority figure fear (or &quot;threatening man in the sky effect&quot;, which is what I&#039;d like everyone to call it from now on). Ben Goldacre, both in &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.amazon.co.uk/Bad-Science-Ben-Goldacre/dp/0007240198/?tag=bs0b-21&#039;&gt;his excellent book &#039;Bad Science&#039;&lt;/a&gt; (I couldn&#039;t bring myself to read &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.badscience.net/&#039;&gt;his blog&lt;/a&gt;, because it updates &lt;em&gt;all the bloody time&lt;/em&gt;: I waited for the novelisation, on the basis that a film probably isn&#039;t forthcoming) and &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/series/badscience&#039;&gt;elsewhere&lt;/a&gt; (I can&#039;t bring myself to subscribe to Guardian feeds either), has been talking about this in the context of science: scientists are seen as authority figures, unfathomable beings issuing pronouncements from on high. I&#039;m sure this view would have shocked &lt;a href=&#039;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Feynman&#039;&gt;Richard Feynman&lt;/a&gt;, who would work through important theories himself rather than rely on the authority of other scientists (the story is &lt;em&gt;The 7 Percent Solution&lt;/em&gt;, in &lt;a href=&#039;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surely_You%27re_Joking,_Mr._Feynman!&#039;&gt;&quot;Surely You&#039;re Joking Mr Feynman!&quot;&lt;/a&gt;), but it does seem to be the way many people - or at least much of the media - think.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Right now, for instance, a Google News search for &#039;scientists&#039; turns up the following headlines:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Scientists take a step closer to an elixir of youth&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Scientists find way to calculate people&#039;s real age&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Scientists test effects of high heels on the body&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Scientists find &#039;cure&#039; for &#039;werewolf boy&#039;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m sure at least some of them rail against these authority figures for bothering to look at trivia such as high heels and absolute age, or will in editorials once they&#039;ve had a chance to think about it. But I don&#039;t think it&#039;s just scientists, and I&#039;m not entirely convinced that &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.badscience.net/?p=172&#039;&gt;the media is responsible for replacing science in the public consciousness with a parody of itself&lt;/a&gt;. I think people are simultaneously &lt;em&gt;comforted&lt;/em&gt; by the idea that there are experts out there - in whatever field, be it politics or science or entertainment or whatever - and &lt;em&gt;threatened&lt;/em&gt; by the same thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The thing is, most people are venal, suspicious, selfish and foolish, just like everyone on &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0285331/&#039;&gt;24&lt;/a&gt;, which I was watching last night and hoping represents in no way whatsoever the reality of the Department of Homeland Security. Or, for that matter, everyone on &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0851851/&#039;&gt;Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;em&gt;including the robots&lt;/em&gt;, which I&#039;m watching as I write this and hoping represents in no way whatsoever the reality of what happens when we accidentally invent a conscious computing network and discover time travel. I don&#039;t want to live in those worlds - but maybe a lot of other people do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which is a problem, frankly, because although people may be blind to logic and science, current evidence suggests that the universe isn&#039;t. This means that people are deliberately putting themselves at a disadvantage by denying themselves the tools to better understand and think about what they have to deal with out in the real world. Of course, they don&#039;t think of it like that - maybe they think they can delegate all that &#039;hard stuff&#039; to authority figures, or maybe they suspect that really it&#039;s all smoke and mirrors, and the scientific method can&#039;t tell them anything. Or maybe they think that invisible dinosaurs rule the earth, or that physics is just like in &lt;a href=&#039;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._J._Abrams&#039;&gt;JJ Abrams&lt;/a&gt;&#039; head, or that actually all our actions are ruled by evil thoughts from before time began. In which case there&#039;s probably not much we can do for them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, seriously. Even the robots are stupid. Who wants to live in a world like that?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://talktorex.co.uk/node/791#comment</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Aylett</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">791 at http://talktorex.co.uk</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

