<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://talktorex.co.uk" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Talk To Rex - Pieces of advertising material that might annoy John Finnemore - part one of at least seventy - Comments</title>
 <link>http://talktorex.co.uk/node/832</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Pieces of advertising material that might annoy John Finnemore - part one of at least seventy&quot;</description>
 <language>en-gb</language>
<item>
 <title>Next week: Dave, on politicians.</title>
 <link>http://talktorex.co.uk/node/832#comment-6009</link>
 <description>You are 100% correct and 0% pear correct in your prediction about my reaction to this. What kind of scale is it that goes from Disappointment to Pear? Pear Crumble: 56% Pear, 44% Disappointment. Pear Drops: 15% Pear, 85% Disappointment. Paul Newman: 0% Pear, 100% Disappointment. But worst of all is the &#039;Steve, on Estate Agents&#039; bit. Oh God, that makes my skin crawl. Steve. He&#039;s such a funny bloke, Steve. You really &lt;i&gt;must&lt;/i&gt; try and get him on estate agents, he sees right through them! He&#039;s hilarious, Steve. Steve. Gotta love Steve. </description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:52:22 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Finnemore</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6009 at http://talktorex.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pieces of advertising material that might annoy John Finnemore - part one of at least seventy</title>
 <link>http://talktorex.co.uk/node/832</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://talktorex.co.uk/files/Magners.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So Magners are selling their Pear Cider on what they seem to believe is its unusual quality of actually containing what it says it does, viz. pear.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They clearly think they&#039;re making a clever point about advertising, highlighted by some observational comedy on estate agents from &#039;Steve&#039;. (Steve, if they say it&#039;s &#039;light and airy&#039; and it only has one window which can open, &lt;em&gt;try a different estate agent&lt;/em&gt;. It&#039;s a crap time to be buying a house anyway.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I could put up with this non-selling point or this slightly tired joke if it wasn&#039;t for the fact that Magners compound their lack of originality with an out-and-out LIE. Magners Pear Cider is NOT, as they claim, 100% pear. That would be pear juice. Either that, or the 100% is true and the cider bit is a lie. I won&#039;t stand for either.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their second statistic is even more dubious. &#039;0% disappointment&#039;, they claim. Really? How did they arrive at this figure? (I see no small print advising &#039;disappointment measured from a survey of 200 pear lovers and rounded down to the nearest whole number&#039;.) I wonder if it might not be a statistic at all but simply a guess, perhaps based on what they assume must be the response to their drink:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&#039;Look, honey, it&#039;s a pear cider which actually contains what it says it does! My, I am pleased - I had imagined that, like Pear&#039;s Soap, it wouldn&#039;t &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; contain pears. But it does, and 100% pears no less! I must say, that leaves absolutely no room for me to be disappointed by it. If I could measure my disappointment now, I would say it would come it at around 0%!&#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whereas I&#039;m guessing an equally common response is: &#039;Mmm, so it&#039;s cider made entirely from pears. Isn&#039;t cider meant to be made from apples? Oh well, I&#039;ll give it a try... *sip* Mmm. It&#039;s okay I suppose, but the apple stuff is the real deal. This is mildly disappointing. Only mildly, mind, but certainly between 10% and 20% if such a thing could be measured&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That Magners have based their television adverts around the lies of &lt;em&gt;other&lt;/em&gt; products is more than a little ironic. And the fact that it&#039;s Mark Watson trying to sell it to me doesn&#039;t make it any better.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://talktorex.co.uk/node/832#comment</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:44:49 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Lark</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">832 at http://talktorex.co.uk</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
