<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://talktorex.co.uk" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Talk To Rex - The Thrasonic Journalist Files - Day Four - Comments</title>
 <link>http://talktorex.co.uk/node/850</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;The Thrasonic Journalist Files - Day Four&quot;</description>
 <language>en-gb</language>
<item>
 <title>The Thrasonic Journalist Files - Day Four</title>
 <link>http://talktorex.co.uk/node/850</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulcarr.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Carr&lt;/a&gt; a thrasonic journalist? Possibly. Certainly he&#039;s an opportunistic one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not just talking about how he&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/paulcarr/100003201/looks-like-ive-cleared-up-the-internet-youre-welcome-the-internet/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lazily recycled my recent blog entries to make one of his own&lt;/a&gt;. What I&#039;m talking about is how, in true &lt;em&gt;Telegraph&lt;/em&gt; journo style, he has taken my criticism of Dominic Cavendish&#039;s caky review along with Mark Thomas&#039; statement that is was more a review of his employer, airbrushed out the bits he doesn&#039;t need with the all-purpose airbrush-all sentence &#039;it&#039;s all very sound-and-fury-signifying nothing&#039; and turned the whole story into a glowing review of himself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But delighted though I am to have my criticisms of &lt;em&gt;Telegraph&lt;/em&gt; journalists so comprehensively vindicated in one fell swoop, I&#039;m not going to be too hard on him for three reasons:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. His comments about &lt;a href=&quot;http://talktorex.co.uk/film/sitcom&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Sitcom&lt;/a&gt; are so aw shucks lovely and quothable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. I have a suspicion that his claim to have cleared up the whole internet might just &lt;em&gt;possibly&lt;/em&gt; be an example of the journalistic irony that Dominic Cavendish aspires to.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. Assuming that to be the case, the rather po-faced comments on the post completely redraw the boundaries of what it means to have a tin ear for journalistic irony. I think I&#039;m in the clear...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://talktorex.co.uk/node/850#comment</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:06:27 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Lark</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">850 at http://talktorex.co.uk</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

