Beast of Bolsover

An entertaining incident in the House of Commons today when Labour MP Dennis Skinner was thrown out for talking about the 1980s in the following terms: “The only thing that was growing then was the lines of coke in front of Boy George over there…”

When speaker Michael Martin asked Skinner to withdraw his comment, Skinner declared “I won’t withdraw it, it was in the News of the World.”

I can’t help wondering if he could possibly have found a less convincing justification for his comment. Even “I won’t withdraw it, I’m a bit senile so I’m allowed to say what I like” might have earned him a little support, or a simple “I won’t withdraw it, it sounded better in my head”. Or “I won’t withdraw it, this is an opportunity to get chucked out of the House of Commons again and spend the rest of the day in the pub.”

After all, the people of Bolsover were already aware that their MP is slightly senile, talks without thinking and probably spends a lot of his time in the pub. They now have to live with the fact that their MP gets his opinions from the News of the World, which is rather less palatable.

Somebody should at least have been generous enough to point out that the person he was gesturing to was not Boy George at all, but David Cameron. I see very little resemblance between the two, but Dennis Skinner is an old man and was seated far enough away from the new Tory leader for such a mistake to at least be understandable. Perhaps he’ll be terribly disappointed when he learns that the new Tory leader is not actually the androgynous singer from Culture Club – but in fairness, Boy George did indeed have growing lines of coke in front of him throughout the 1980s, so perhaps it was just a horrible misunderstanding.

That's entertainment

When Michael Jackson was on trial there was a (rather crappy) televised dramatisation of the whole thing.

But Michael Jackson’s trial was boring. Even when he wasn’t too upset by it to put his face on and turn up, it was pretty tame entertainment – unless you get off on stories about grown men sharing beds with children, which you wouldn’t unless you were Michael Jackson, who I presume didn’t tune in to the dramatisation for personal reasons.

On the other hand, Saddam Hussein’s trial has been FANTASTIC. Great entertainment every day combining comedy and tragedy and a character we all know and love. (It surely can’t just be me who sort of loves Saddam? I mean, I know he’s an evil dictator and all that, but not in the league of Hitler or Stalin – let’s face it, Tony Blair’s killed a lot of people in Iraq as well, but we haven’t put him on trial yet – and now that he has a beard he looks like Santa Claus, which I think is rather endearing – Saddam that is, not Tony.)

All sorts of entertaining leaping up and shouting and people denouncing everybody else on a daily basis… So why oh why hasn’t somebody decided to dramatise this trial?

Rice

Why is it, that however little you use, however restrained you are, however much you remember the disasters of dinners past and hold back from putting in what looks like the right amount but instead use but a few grains that look insufficient to feed a fieldmouse, you still always end up with too much rice???

I've got that prickling sensation

I put on a couple of episodes of the 1966 Dr Who story The War Machines last night. I was thinking what a frankly ridiculous story it is when my housemate suddenly said “It’s very adult compared to the recent series, isn’t it?” I muttered something about it being a bit silly, and he replied “but it’s really building up the tension!”

I hadn’t even noticed. I’d spent most of it worrying because I couldn’t remember which story was the last one to feature companions Ben and Polly (I know, I know, it’s The Faceless Ones) and thinking how poorly structured the script was and how William Hartnell couldn’t remember any of it anyway.

It made me wonder if being a Doctor Who fan just takes all the enjoyment out of watching it.

Just a whistle

I’ve just finished the dress rehearsal for Whistle Down the Wind, the rather wonderful musical I’m MDing in my local church. Tis but a local amateur production, so theoretically small stuff compared to some of the shows I’ve been involved in – but I can honestly say I feel humbled and privileged to be a part of it. It takes a certain type of community spirit to assemble a cast of twenty-five children and twenty-five adults in completely accurate 1950s costumes, not to mention to build a whacking great barn in a church. And burn it down.

And everyone – children especially, in fact – is doing justice to the difficult and uncompromising score, even though they’re spaced around the building in a way that isn’t in the least bit practical when it comes to hearing the orchestra, or indeed watching me struggle to conduct in more ridiculous time signatures than I’ve ever seen next to each other before.

Actually, having seen Harry Potter the other day, I would be so bold as to say that some of our kids are better than theirs.

On the other hand, Harry Potter was worth it for the moment when David Tennant was revealed as the villain and a little girl in the row behind me whispered in disbelief “That’s Doctor Who!”

Bad idea?

I just got an email from Make Povery History with the heading “Tell Jack Straw to act”.

What a good idea. Nobody likes Jack Straw as a politician, but if he became an actor I have a feeling he’d soon be in the running for a part in the fifth Harry Potter film. After all, we enjoyed his villainy in children’s TV series The Demon Headmaster, and after the last decade of labour government he’s had plenty of chances to practice being even more repugnantly evil. I for one would pay very good money to see Jack Straw play any of the following roles:

Richard III
Professor Higgins
The Master (he has to return to Dr Who sooner or later)
Hitler (now that Michael Sheard is no longer with us)
Captain Hook
Judas
The narrator in The Rocky Horror Show
Dracula
Mephistopheles
The Child Catcher in Chitty Chitty Bang Bang

The more I think about it the more I think he’d actually be phenomenal in these roles, and many more. So can I also urge you to tell Jack Straw to act at the soonest possible opportunity – I’m going to.

In the news today…

Tory leader Micheal Howard takes one last opportunity to say something facile about Blair’s leadership.

The poor silly man has been saying that Blair’s power is waning ever since he became Tory leader. Hasn’t he managed to develop even the tiniest sense of irony?

I also like the bit at the side that says “How damaged is Blair?” Do they mean psychologically? Shouldn’t we have learned about this before he became Prime Minister?