http://talktorex.co.uk Comments for "" en-gb http://talktorex.co.uk/node/884#comment-7807 The basic lack of grammar and the failure to construct a sound argument in these comments suggests that 'loans' (whoever he or she may be) has been through the current AS system. Furthermore, the failure of either 'loans' or his/her mate 'business loans' to identify themselves properly means that their comments are, as spam, utterly useless in selling their particular product, further evidence of the worrying state of our education system. Thank you for proving my point. But I agree that it is good that people can get business loans and they open up completely new possibilities. Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:45:01 +0100 James Lark comment 7807 at http://talktorex.co.uk http://talktorex.co.uk/node/884#comment-7805 That's good that people can get the business loans and it opens completely new possibilities. Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:17:00 +0100 business loans comment 7805 at http://talktorex.co.uk http://talktorex.co.uk/node/884#comment-7803 Specialists say that personal loans help people to live their own way, just because they can feel free to buy necessary goods. Furthermore, banks offer small business loan for different persons. Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:03:00 +0100 loans comment 7803 at http://talktorex.co.uk http://talktorex.co.uk/node/883#comment-7801 I do rather think you're in a minority, Andrew. Unless you're talking about the 'stock rural music' that Murray Gold penned for the very opening, in which case I would definitely have joined you in hurling things, at the speakers at least. Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:55:41 +0100 James Lark comment 7801 at http://talktorex.co.uk http://talktorex.co.uk/node/883#comment-7798 'Amy's choice' made we want to hurl things at the television Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:25:31 +0100 Andrew comment 7798 at http://talktorex.co.uk http://talktorex.co.uk/node/880#comment-7381 Well done us! Want to form a coalition? Mon, 10 May 2010 14:27:59 +0100 James Lark comment 7381 at http://talktorex.co.uk http://talktorex.co.uk/node/880#comment-7380 We are, therefore, agreed! Mon, 10 May 2010 12:58:12 +0100 Emily comment 7380 at http://talktorex.co.uk http://talktorex.co.uk/node/880#comment-7379 ...and our right to protest is an important one. Damn straight we should use this window of opportunity to push for electoral reform. But that's really a different issue to the people who a presuming to hold their own informal and one-sided referendums on who should govern us in the immediate future - that ship has sailed. Mon, 10 May 2010 12:43:55 +0100 James Lark comment 7379 at http://talktorex.co.uk http://talktorex.co.uk/node/880#comment-7378 I agree with you about arguments regarding the Conservatives’ right to form a government. But the point about the protests for the voting system is that a small window of opportunity has been opened up by this result and the role the Lib Dems are playing. It’s not enough to wait for the next election and to lobby our MPs – the ERS has been doing that for 125 years. So really it is ‘now or not for a very long time’. And the protests will strengthen the hand of those within the talks who are arguing exactly this point. It has always been said that you will never get people marching in the streets for electoral reform, that it’s not an issue anyone really cares about. To show that people (even if only a small number of people organised through facebook) do care, could make a real difference to internal discussions. Mon, 10 May 2010 12:20:39 +0100 Emily comment 7378 at http://talktorex.co.uk http://talktorex.co.uk/node/877#comment-7355 From what I understood of it, the 'humour' was seemed to be in the fact that the stereotypes were somewhat OTT. That's not to say I found the sketches amusing, nor is it to say I condone the sketches themselves. "It's hardly worth getting incensed about, but..." if it's something deeply personal we can't help but become incensed. Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:47:12 +0100 Anonymous comment 7355 at http://talktorex.co.uk http://talktorex.co.uk/node/867#comment-7082 ...but thanks for letting us know. I assume you ARE the famous H from Steps, and not some random H we haven't heard of? If so I'm glad to see you're now in the TV extra work market - all that stuff about becoming an actor was a bit unrealistic, really, wasn't it? Good luck, and sorry again to hear of your confusion. I trust our blog was not the cause (it seems pretty clear to me). Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:46:05 +0000 James Lark comment 7082 at http://talktorex.co.uk http://talktorex.co.uk/node/869#comment-7080 Everyone who has stuck up for Glee (discounting those who resort to the "I heart Glee" with a million exclamation marks hysteria that seems to inexplicably reduce the critical faculties of people who I otherwise quite like) has given these rather apologetic reasons to watch it, often including the proviso that it's great after a glass or two of wine. I've no doubt that's true, but when there's other, genuinely good drama to watch, a finite number of hours in the day and the programme in question offers less satisfaction than I get from pairing up my socks, I think I'll give it a miss. I was one of the not-IT kids and I got a lot more encouragement from the likes of Doctor Who (though of course, that was in the 80s when the Doctor was also one of the not-IT kids...) Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:00:58 +0000 James Lark comment 7080 at http://talktorex.co.uk http://talktorex.co.uk/node/867#comment-7077 Hmmm I'm abit confused :S Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:27:36 +0000 tv extra work comment 7077 at http://talktorex.co.uk http://talktorex.co.uk/node/869#comment-7076 Yes, Glee is predictable in the story lines, does a lot of going back and forth (how many times can they each quit and storm out?!) and is highly unbelievable in many ways - BUT if you take yourself way back to when you were a teenager (and yes, James - I know you were one once!), you can appreciate how Glee might appeal to the younger generation. It acknowledges the repetative stupidity of "highschool" behaviour, the bullying, lack of confidence and general banality of being an outcast teenager... or, in fact, any teenager. Something to which they can relate. Yes, the show features gross over-exaggeration of the points: everyone feels different and awkward; has hidden talents that in reality will rarely be overwhelmingly brilliant; and gets frustrated by the unfairness of the way they're treated by peers and overseers alike... but if you just sit back and enjoy the over-the-top point-making, and suspend your disbelief, and pretend you're one of the "not-IT" kids, it's actually all rather cute. So I like it. That and the Mash-ups they do (has it reached that far yet on UK TV?) - which are adorably inspiring at times and worth watching the rest of the series so that you can build up the context. I'm not offering any spoilers by telling you to look out for the Police/Gary Puckett & the Union Gap mash-up in episode ten. Give it a chance - if nothing else, just for Jayma Mays unbelievably sweet-yet-hypnotic eyes... Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:27:04 +0000 Wednesday comment 7076 at http://talktorex.co.uk http://talktorex.co.uk/node/869#comment-7066 Plentiful jokes? Really? Where? Which ones? I think you might have self-edited them in. If you really still think "New Directions" was a joke, I think you are simply lending your own (plentiful) sense of irony to the show. I saw no evidence of it being remotely knowing, though I did find plenty to laugh at... Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:31:29 +0000 James Lark comment 7066 at http://talktorex.co.uk